<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Federal Tax Software and Online Filing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/2006/01/28/free-federal-tax-software-and-online-filing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/2006/01/28/free-federal-tax-software-and-online-filing/</link>
	<description>The supposedly futile struggle against chaos - with a focus on Linux migration, security, corrosion engineering, surviving cancer, website construction, and life...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:11:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramblings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Less vs. Fewer Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/2006/01/28/free-federal-tax-software-and-online-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramblings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Less vs. Fewer Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/2006/01/28/free-federal-tax-software-and-online-filing#comment-832</guid>
		<description>[...] Less vs. Fewer Revisited A friend took pleasure in pointing out that I used a grammatical construct in my last post that I had criticized in the post immediately prior. At least he thinks I did. Clearly, he didn&#8217;t bother the read the supporting link that I posted: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Less vs. Fewer Revisited A friend took pleasure in pointing out that I used a grammatical construct in my last post that I had criticized in the post immediately prior. At least he thinks I did. Clearly, he didn&#8217;t bother the read the supporting link that I posted: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techno-Tard</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/2006/01/28/free-federal-tax-software-and-online-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Techno-Tard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/2006/01/28/free-federal-tax-software-and-online-filing#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Great article, Greg!  Thanks for the info and the investigative nature of your search.  This will be a help to many of us.

I have to ask though, if your use of the wording:

&quot;the refund was directly deposited into my checking account in less than two weeks&quot;

shouldn&#039;t have actually read:  &quot;in &lt;i&gt;fewer&lt;/i&gt; than two weeks&quot;? :)

As always, Love your Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Greg!  Thanks for the info and the investigative nature of your search.  This will be a help to many of us.</p>
<p>I have to ask though, if your use of the wording:</p>
<p>&#8220;the refund was directly deposited into my checking account in less than two weeks&#8221;</p>
<p>shouldn&#8217;t have actually read:  &#8220;in <i>fewer</i> than two weeks&#8221;? <img src='http://www.gregrperry.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As always, Love your Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
